CPT Grading 3
Student 1 Grade
Reporting Category |
Requirements |
Student Score |
College Board Score |
Program Purpose and Function |
|
0 |
0 |
Data Abstraction |
|
0 |
0 |
Managing Complexity |
|
0 |
0 |
Procedural Abstraction |
|
0 |
0 |
Algorithm Implementation |
|
0 |
0 |
Testing |
|
1 |
1 |
Student 2 Grade
Reporting Category |
Requirements |
Student Score |
College Board Score |
Program Purpose and Function |
|
1 |
1 |
Data Abstraction |
|
1 |
1 |
Managing Complexity |
|
1 |
1 |
Procedural Abstraction |
|
1 |
1 |
Algorithm Implementation |
|
1 |
1 |
Testing |
|
1 |
1 |
Student 3 Grade
Reporting Category |
Requirements |
Student Score |
College Board Score |
Program Purpose and Function |
|
0 |
0 |
Data Abstraction |
|
1 |
1 |
Managing Complexity |
|
1 |
1 |
Procedural Abstraction |
|
1 |
1 |
Algorithm Implementation |
|
1 |
1 |
Testing |
|
1 |
1 |
Student 4 Grade
Reporting Category |
Requirements |
Student Score |
College Board Score |
Program Purpose and Function |
|
1 |
1 |
Data Abstraction |
|
1 |
0 |
Managing Complexity |
|
0 |
0 |
Procedural Abstraction |
|
1 |
1 |
Algorithm Implementation |
|
1 |
1 |
Testing |
|
0 |
0 |
Reflection
For the most part, there were little to no discrepancies with any of my scoring and CollegeBoards. On the 4th student’s work, I thought that the student deserved the point for list data usage. However, because they only used a certain attribute of the list, CollegeBoard deemed it unworthy of recieving a 1 in that category. For my project, I’ll make sure to correctly use and explain the usage of data within any list I create so that I don’t miss this point in the future. I am already showcasing this in my implementation of the Todo API which is viewable at this URL The fourth submission did not meet the Data Abstractions criteria for the mentioned reason. It missed Managing Complexity due to insufficient management; it only had a counter which wasn’t enough for the points. Finally, the testing criteria was not met due to a lack of arguments for the tester function.